Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Psychiatry Kills
Tue, March 25, 2008 - 10:51 PMout of date, inflammatory, and often incorrect. -
-
Re: Psychiatry Kills
Wed, March 26, 2008 - 3:49 PMFiling under "W" for "whatever". -
-
Re: Psychiatry Kills
Wed, March 26, 2008 - 11:18 PMi think we should consider that even as we learn more and more about the brain and human misery, that there are places where judgments are made about what counts as sickness and health, and that psychiatry occurs within the context of cultural valuations and practices and must be supervised from within and without.
i am not defending this film, hear me clearly on that. but i am defending it as an opportunity to discuss some of the issues listed above. they cannot be swept away with a wave of the hand. why not take this as an opportunity to discuss the matters a bit? -
-
Re: Psychiatry Kills
Sun, March 30, 2008 - 11:38 PMwell, that was delightful. i like the cadence of the announcer man's voice, very emotive. perhaps he deserves a new five digit code with a new disease label, like overly inflammatory withease. maybe thats just a v-code for focus of treatment.
and, despite the fact that they were mixing apples and oranges like seeking quantitative measures for qualitative phenomina, it was kinda fun. dude did get diagnoses in the bi-polar range pretty consistantly, so thats something. and there is a problem with ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
sadly, the film makers didn't know enough to really kick the dsm where its most accurate and where there is some actual debate, which would be axis 2 and the personality disorders, at least in the psychoanalytic community. but personality disorders scare people, especially people with overly inflammatory withease. bi-polar and add/adhd are easier to pick on because both are often irresponsibly diagnosed, or totally missed. and the psychotic disorders have been around too long to pick on, unless we want to talk about models of the mind, ethnography, social systems.... . .
-
Re: Psychiatry Kills
Sat, April 26, 2008 - 7:34 AMvery thoughtful post Blue-J -
-
Re: Psychiatry Kills
Mon, April 28, 2008 - 3:48 PMthanks cathy! can you share more of your reaction?
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Psychiatry Kills
Thu, April 24, 2008 - 7:07 AMit appears to me this vid is saying that the everyday joe / josephine has the impression that the 5-digit number and diagnosis of their illness is a scientfic exactitude, with a logical course of treatment via chemotherapy for da brain. the clear-eyed quite frank shrinks, say, no, these are guesstimates agreed upon by a majority vote. this does not negate their usefulness by the psych community, as it allows them a way to communicate with each other about these eccentricities of the mind. i do not see where the vid takes issue in this light, but takes issue with the pharmco's promotion of DSM as true science, and that the code supplied will direct the shrink to supply the perfect meds for that specific issue. meds have many effects on a persons physical/ mental health, the ones that are injurious are called 'side' effects. an effect is an effect, and there can be some potentially life-threatening 'sides' in our meds... the 5-digit code also allows the practioner to fill in the proper blanks for the insurance coverage, much to the glee of the pharm companies...what am i saying [and i think so is the vid]? the DSM started out well, has become over-run with vagueries that support the perscription of numerous nebulous medications, that the DSM is an in=house tool of shrinks promoted by the pharms to the public as science, and most important, 50% of all writers of those scripts graduated in the bottom half of their class so just might be relying a bit too much on the crutch given them by the DSM -
-
Re: Psychiatry Kills
Fri, April 25, 2008 - 11:49 PMthe DSM is a dictionary of shorthand and insurance codes, with some interesting stats, but it also does contain some valuations that aren't responsibly contextualized enough. for example, take gender identity disorder. can anyone find any trouble with a man who's 100% comfortable being a man and embodying the norm of malehood in his culture? from the point of view of mental health, we should, but from the point of norm-centered psychiatry like the DSM, such a person could not be considered disordered because they don't experience conscious discomfort identified with the norm adoption. the DSM-IV is better than III for sure about this kind of thing. consider the perspective necessary to discern "delusion" as a component of psychosis, as another example. is george bush deluded? he is a big imaginary big papa friend who tells him whether or not to bomb countries, and yet his delusion is popular, so we say nothing much about it psychiatrically. mass delusions aren't fodder for diagnosis hardly, and this gives the DSM a kind of norm support function that is unseemly. -
-
Re: Psychiatry Kills
Fri, April 25, 2008 - 11:50 PM(i know gender identity disorder is kids only, don't both correcting me on it, move on, i just mistyped there...)
-
-